Log in
Sign up
Login
Recover password
Login
Double Lightning Strike
Category:
Video
|
27 Apr, 2011 |
Views: 10489
|
-12
|
№1
Author:
gari
(27 Apr 2011 22:20) Total user comments:
574
Status:
Activity rewards:
+5
This is fake, it can't be!!!!!
Reply
Send a message
№2
Author:
raymond.wendt
(28 Apr 2011 03:58) Total user comments:
9115
Status:
Activity rewards:
+2
Wow, I don't know if he's lucky, or unlucky...
Reply
Send a message
№3
Author:
Eru
(28 Apr 2011 05:52) Total user comments:
146
Status:
Activity rewards:
+4
Probably has a better chance of winning the lottery now
Reply
Send a message
№4
Author:
Brian_Connery
(28 Apr 2011 06:44) Total user comments:
332
Status:
Activity rewards:
+4
wow dude
talk about a bad day!
Reply
Send a message
№5
Author:
capt.huffnpuff
(28 Apr 2011 07:01) Total user comments:
2822
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
gari
, Why not? Wrong place, wrong time, very bad luck. Lightning does strike twice at the same place.
Reply
Send a message
№6
Author:
Jinxaruny
(28 Apr 2011 10:22) Total user comments:
10324
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
If this is real, he's real lucky to just walk away... both times...
Reply
Send a message
№7
Author:
Lord Dodo
(28 Apr 2011 10:51) Total user comments:
2064
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
and out of the cam range, he gets hit a third time
Reply
Send a message
№8
Author:
2fuzzy
(28 Apr 2011 15:17) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
+9
Fake.
1) A bolt of lighting will make contact to the tallest object (with in 45 degrees). The guy was walking beside a van, trees, not to mention the building holding the 'security camera'
2) If you pull the video from other websites where you can pause it and still see the picture, you will see that the lightning does not cast shadows from the vehicles nor does it over power the shadows of the street light.
3) No way he would get up from that without at least having visible damage.
Reply
Send a message
№9
Author:
DocMcCoy
(28 Apr 2011 17:17) Total user comments:
6039
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
2fuzzy you're THE man. Unless he had a metal plate in his head.
Reply
Send a message
№10
Author:
mahedi
(28 Apr 2011 19:51) Total user comments:
10772
Status:
Activity rewards:
-2
Fucking fake
Reply
Send a message
№11
Author:
MrMaj81
(28 Apr 2011 21:15) Total user comments:
764
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
fake
Reply
Send a message
№12
Author:
agentsoforange
(28 Apr 2011 23:46) Total user comments:
169
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
2fuzzy
,
Also, the passing vehicles have headlights on which suggest it's night or dusk at best. The camera would be compensating for the lack light, so the intense light emitted by a lightning strike would have over exposed the entire frame.
Lightning doesn't follow the shortest path ie. tall buildings, it follows the path of least resistance. If the guy was wearing a faraday cage, it's conceivable discharge would bypass trees, buildings and vehicles, opting for the cage having the least resistance.
Still... it's a poor fake.
Reply
Send a message
№13
Author:
yamaz
(29 Apr 2011 01:05) Total user comments:
639
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
fake as shite
Reply
Send a message
№14
Author:
2fuzzy
(29 Apr 2011 14:48) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
+2
agentsoforange,
I do understand the path of least resistance, however I was trying to keep the explanation kind of simple and not get into resistance of the different objects when compared to humid air.
another point to prove it is a fake: The bolt should have been close enough to screw up the camera's electronics for a split second due to the EM it would have been giving off.
Reply
Send a message
Add comment
Name:
E-Mail:
bold
italic
underlined
strike
Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image: