Log in
Sign up
Login
Recover password
Login
Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)
Category:
Pics
|
20 Jul, 2017 |
Views: 10838
|
+78
|
This guy has just had enough of Twitter, so he decided to roast them.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Source
№1
Author:
Nick1090
(20 Jul 2017 13:00) Total user comments:
1257
Status:
Activity rewards:
+5
People Eating Tasty Animals
Reply
Send a message
№2
Author:
EnderWiggin
(22 Jul 2017 00:10) Total user comments:
375
Status:
Activity rewards:
-12
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.
1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.
BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.
Reply
Send a message
№3
Author:
SFLAG
(26 Jul 2017 01:05) Total user comments:
100
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Quote: EnderWiggin
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.
1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.
BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.
I'm not sure how you think any of that is a devastating take-down.
It's my understanding that PETA isn't in the business of "saving animals" at all. They are in the business of "ending animal slavery" etc., which means they don't think animals should be pets, and would prefer that dogs and cats (for instance) be euthanized than be "slaves" (aka pets).
Reply
Send a message
№4
Author:
EnderWiggin
(3 Aug 2017 02:37) Total user comments:
375
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Quote: SFLAG
Quote: EnderWiggin
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.
1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.
BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.
I'm not sure how you think any of that is a devastating take-down.
It's my understanding that PETA isn't in the business of "saving animals" at all. They are in the business of "ending animal slavery" etc., which means they don't think animals should be pets, and would prefer that dogs and cats (for instance) be euthanized than be "slaves" (aka pets).
Facts are facts. If they are not accurate, they are not facts. Simple as that.
Reply
Send a message
№5
Author:
kryptor
(8 Aug 2017 06:34) Total user comments:
4840
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Out of shear spite, I'm going to have a Bacon, Egg and Cheese sandwich.
Reply
Send a message
Add comment
Name:
E-Mail:
bold
italic
underlined
strike
Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image:
|
