Log in
Sign up
Login
Recover password
Login
Hyperreal Paintings (55 pics)
Category:
Pics
|
10 Mar, 2010 |
Views: 14312
|
+63
|
I would never guess that these pictures are actually paintings.
But they are.
Unbelievable.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
№1
Author:
MathIsHard
(10 Mar 2010 02:43) Total user comments:
1404
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
some of them are so perfect you can tell they're not real...
Reply
Send a message
№2
Author: hijm (10 Mar 2010 04:12) Total user comments:
0
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
dang she's better then leonardo da vinci and michaelangelo combined
Reply
Send a message
№3
Author:
gerachev
(10 Mar 2010 04:21) Total user comments:
1600
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№4
Author:
delorarose
(10 Mar 2010 04:36) Total user comments:
322
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№5
Author:
Louie
(10 Mar 2010 05:56) Total user comments:
8189
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
wooah
Reply
Send a message
№6
Author:
Real Deaf
(10 Mar 2010 06:39) Total user comments:
1371
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№7
Author:
alukard
(10 Mar 2010 07:21) Total user comments:
120
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
i cant believe yet
Reply
Send a message
№8
Author:
Sped17
(10 Mar 2010 07:49) Total user comments:
51
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
@ hijm......she?? These are paintings by a number of different artists including Robert Bechtle, Charles Bell, and Richard Estes just to name a couple off the top of my head that I recognized right away.
Reply
Send a message
№9
Author:
salsapopo
(10 Mar 2010 10:18) Total user comments:
12723
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
nice
Reply
Send a message
№10
Author: Tanvir (10 Mar 2010 10:41) Total user comments:
0
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
Who says those r paintings!!
Reply
Send a message
№11
Author:
Jinxaruny
(10 Mar 2010 12:54) Total user comments:
10324
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№12
Author:
khannibal
(10 Mar 2010 13:29) Total user comments:
4711
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№13
Author:
2fuzzy
(10 Mar 2010 13:53) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Nice work.
Reply
Send a message
№14
Author:
EarlpitsII
(10 Mar 2010 15:01) Total user comments:
131
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
wow. Such skill.
Reply
Send a message
№15
Author:
pimphomie
(10 Mar 2010 16:07) Total user comments:
635
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Amazing
Reply
Send a message
№16
Author:
Patty
(10 Mar 2010 16:40) Total user comments:
1766
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Wow...amazing!
Reply
Send a message
№17
Author: hey (10 Mar 2010 17:06) Total user comments:
0
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
these are not real paintings. there photos that some one painted over.
Reply
Send a message
№18
Author:
snake eyes
(10 Mar 2010 17:46) Total user comments:
64
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
amazing..these are paintings
???
The word Photorealism was coined by Louis K. Meisel in 1968 and appeared in print for the first time in 1970 in a Whitney Museum catalogue for the show "Twenty-two Realists."[17] It is also sometimes labeled as Super-Realism, New Realism, Sharp Focus Realism, or Hyper-Realism.[18]
Louis K. Meisel, two years later, developed a five-point definition at the request of Stuart M. Speiser, who had commissioned a large collection of works by the Photorealists, which later developed into a traveling show known as "Photo-Realism 1973: The Stuart M. Speiser Collection," which was donated to the Smithsonian in 1978 and is shown in several of its museums as well as traveling under the auspices of SITE.[17] The definition was as follows:
1. The Photo-Realist uses the camera and photograph to gather information.
2. The Photo-Realist uses a mechanical or semimechanical means to transfer the information to the canvas.
3. The Photo-Realist must have the technical ability to make the finished work appear photographic.
4. The artist must have exhibited work as a Photo-Realist by 1972 to be considered one of the central Photo-Realists.
5. The artist must have devoted at least five years to the development and exhibition of Photo-Realist work
Reply
Send a message
№19
Author:
Tomeecheck
(10 Mar 2010 21:16) Total user comments:
7
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
who are the artists?
Reply
Send a message
№20
Author:
picklini
(10 Mar 2010 23:45) Total user comments:
352
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
oh, i thought they were all by one person. thanks for the heads up
Reply
Send a message
№21
Author:
Ty Webb
(11 Mar 2010 18:52) Total user comments:
6156
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
snake
Without your input I would never believe these were paintings. Thank you for the detailed information. I mean that I am not being sarcastic. I am curious though about what exactly ''mechanical or semi - mechanical means of transferring the information to canvas is all about.
Can you expand your answer?
Yes I know I always say I never come back to a post... and I never do but I will make an exception this time as I am really interested in how this is done. More importantly the degree and way in which mechanical devises are used to create the image.
oh and I KNOW I AM A HORRIBLE SPELLUR(wink wink) . No I mean it i am bad because I am too lazy to use spell check. I was told being a good or bad speller was no sign of the degree of intelligence one possesses. ex; Albert Einstein was an incredibly poor speller too.
Reply
Send a message
№22
Author:
aks3167
(11 Mar 2010 20:11) Total user comments:
1674
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
awesome...............cooooooo
ool
Reply
Send a message
№23
Author:
fairmania
(12 Mar 2010 01:57) Total user comments:
1460
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Breathtaking, all of them. And I echo Freds thanks to snake for the info. Skills beyond mere mortals.
Reply
Send a message
№24
Author:
Shay
(12 Mar 2010 12:25) Total user comments:
1297
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Very nice
Reply
Send a message
Add comment
Name:
E-Mail:
bold
italic
underlined
strike
Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image: