USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    May 2018    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 

May 2018 (556)
April 2018 (704)
March 2018 (728)
February 2018 (663)
January 2018 (681)
December 2017 (706)

North Korea Claims They've Developed Miniaturized Nuclear Weapons (3 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 10 Mar, 2016  |
  • Views: 4158  |
  • Like
  • -7
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

North Korean dictator recently posed with a device that North Korea claims to be a "miniaturized nuclear warhead." Despite the claims of the people who have created the mock up, experts are skeptical that North Korea even has the right technology to create such a device. According to the inventors the device can be attached to a missile and it's being described as a nuclear warhead with a North Korean mixed charge.

1 North Korea Claims They've Developed Miniaturized Nuclear Weapons (3 pics)


2 North Korea Claims They've Developed Miniaturized Nuclear Weapons (3 pics)


3 North Korea Claims They've Developed Miniaturized Nuclear Weapons (3 pics)


Do you like it?




№1 Author: OldOllie (10 Mar 2016 06:55) Total user comments: 1576


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
We'd better just nuke the $#!+ out of them. just to be on the safe side. 05
  Reply       
№2 Author: Aindy (10 Mar 2016 11:40) Total user comments: 2863


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Quote: OldOllie
We'd better just nuke the $#!+ out of them. just to be on the safe side. 05


You dont nuke people who have nukes. We learnt that from the cold war. Infact, thats probably the only reason NK is still alive.
  Reply       
№3 Author: taromaro (10 Mar 2016 12:24) Total user comments: 175


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Kim doesn't look too happy. That ball is still too large to shove it up his ass
  Reply       
№4 Author: styopa (10 Mar 2016 15:48) Total user comments: 1231


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Quote: Aindy
Quote: OldOllie
We'd better just nuke the $#!+ out of them. just to be on the safe side. 05


You dont nuke people who have nukes. We learnt that from the cold war. Infact, thats probably the only reason NK is still alive.

LOL if you think that a) that's why DPRK is still around (they didn't have nukes for the last 60 years, how do you explain that?) and b) they actually have nukes.

Their 50,000+ artillery tubes aimed at every square foot in Seoul are far more dangerous than any dinky atomic bomb they may or may not have.
  Reply       
№5 Author: Aindy (10 Mar 2016 17:02) Total user comments: 2863


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Quote: styopa
Quote: Aindy
Quote: OldOllie
We'd better just nuke the $#!+ out of them. just to be on the safe side. 05


You dont nuke people who have nukes. We learnt that from the cold war. Infact, thats probably the only reason NK is still alive.

LOL if you think that a) that's why DPRK is still around (they didn't have nukes for the last 60 years, how do you explain that?) and b) they actually have nukes.

Their 50,000+ artillery tubes aimed at every square foot in Seoul are far more dangerous than any dinky atomic bomb they may or may not have.


Thats because until recently they were supported by russia, nuff said.
And NK have had nukes since 2006. Maybe not mounted on intercontinential missiles, but definetly with plenty of range.
Those artillery shells are dangerous to South Korea, but not much else. And you can take out most of the artillery with one major airstrike/bombardment, not a huge issue if some survive. If one nuclear missile survives thats a whole different ball game...
  Reply       
№6 Author: Tomaz86 (11 Mar 2016 03:17) Total user comments: 10834


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
Nobody cares idiot guy.
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: