The Science Behind Human Decapitation (10 pics)

If the definition of a criminal is someone who breaks the law.

Doesn't it seem absurd to think that simply making more laws
will somehow produce less criminals?

kryptor,

whilte it's a logically good question, the consequence of it would be, that the best country is an anarchistic one, because with no laws the criminality rate drops to null...

yea there's the answer.

ShaneobiOne,
I think that is far too much of a generalisation. You can have so many laws that they intefere with each other and slow beauracracy down to a snails pace. Changing old laws is harder than imposing new ones, and there used to be a lot of crazy laws..... and many of them are still in effect.

For example, it is legal for earls and dukes of britain to go fox hunting on any farm in ireland without prior notice or compensation for crops or livestock damaged. This was a law passed by an earl in the 1700s when ireland was still occupied by england. Becoming an independent and free country did not change this law, and people who try to change it get threatened both legally and physically.

This is just one example of thousands. We all know the major laws, but there are so many that one needs to hire a professional to explain what laws do exist.

Thank you for information.

ahh :13:

kryptor,
you see this nonsense with gun laws constantly.