USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Oct 2018    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

October 2018 (528)
September 2018 (659)
August 2018 (759)
July 2018 (726)
June 2018 (679)
May 2018 (721)

World's First Things (16 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 4 Mar, 2014  |
  • Views: 24183  |
  • Like
  • +89
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Those are the world's first things.

1 World's First Things (16 pics)


2 World's First Things (16 pics)


3 World's First Things (16 pics)


4 World's First Things (16 pics)


5 World's First Things (16 pics)



6 World's First Things (16 pics)


7 World's First Things (16 pics)


8 World's First Things (16 pics)


9 World's First Things (16 pics)


10 World's First Things (16 pics)


11 World's First Things (16 pics)


12 World's First Things (16 pics)


13 World's First Things (16 pics)


14 World's First Things (16 pics)


15 World's First Things (16 pics)


16 World's First Things (16 pics)

Source


Do you like it?




№1 Author: candysack (4 Mar 2014 04:39) Total user comments: 1436


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
i would have loved to listen to mix tape of my pictures in the car :08:
  Reply       
№2 Author: Slugsie (4 Mar 2014 15:01) Total user comments: 1575


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
#15 Interesting reading the first article description, appears to suggest that 'lad' was used to refer to a female rather than a male.
  Reply       
№3 Author: Vladimir Harkonnen (4 Mar 2014 17:18) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Slugsie,
It's 'lady', not 'lad' printed there.
  Reply       
№4 Author: mobius (4 Mar 2014 18:06) Total user comments: 1073


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool!
  Reply       
№5 Author: Lu (4 Mar 2014 18:10) Total user comments: 15100


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
C'mon you jackass scientists, we need more new things.
  Reply       
№6 Author: saint357 (4 Mar 2014 19:35) Total user comments: 2366


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow some really harsh people today! :02:
  Reply       
№7 Author: YeahRight (4 Mar 2014 22:49) Total user comments: 1649


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
...COOL!!! :12: :04: :12:
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: