Fun Facts. Part 16 (27 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 3 Jan, 2014  |
  • Views: 17413  |
  • Like
  • +51
  • Dislike  |
  •  


№1 Author: MWarrior (3 Jan 2014 05:54) Total user comments: 1024


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +4
  • Like
#1: I'd say it's pretty impressive that 40% of the certainly-doomed-without-
his-two-days-of-help restaurants DIDN'T close. 60% of any business folds in the first year anyways, so that's an average number- certainly not a failure like it's trying to imply.
  Reply       
№2 Author: capt.huffnpuff (3 Jan 2014 06:45) Total user comments: 2822


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
#2 Amazing Fun Fact: The Olsen twins (shown) are NOT identical and their children would not be genetic siblings.
  Reply       
№3 Author: NIA666 (3 Jan 2014 11:15) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Pic 27
That only proves what i suspected: Alexander was spoiled brat with lot of luck. Such ideas as demographic engeneering bring nothing more than misery.
Proofs?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P

opulation_transfer
I don't want to get into details because no one really cares and it's TL;DR but be aware that social engeneering/resettlement were Joseph Stalin most favored toys.
  Reply       
№4 Author: styopa (3 Jan 2014 16:32) Total user comments: 1538


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
#6 not really true, but close.
A football game, timing only from snap-to-whistle on each play, is about 30 minutes.

For those who thereby poo-pooh this as "not really much activity", I'd point out 2 things:
1) wrestling is a total of 6 minutes, and I don't see anyone doubting that sport.
2) feel free to step onto even a low-ranked college football field and play for just a quarter - that would be only about 7-8 minutes. Let's see how you do.
  Reply       
№5 Author: Lu (3 Jan 2014 22:32) Total user comments: 15132


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
#24 Why?
  Reply       
№6 Author: yamaz (4 Jan 2014 03:15) Total user comments: 639


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
#21 is fucking FALSE. Italy can do that better than France.
  Reply       
№7 Author: MWarrior (4 Jan 2014 06:49) Total user comments: 1024


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
^ Actually, it's TRUE. Look up "agriculturally self-sufficient country in Europe" and you'll see the only answer is France. They say nothing about Italy.
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image: