Camouflage (10 pics)

These are hunters.








But why don't military and paramilitaries use mossy oak? :51: It seems pretty effective

porque en ves de hacer Camouflage no hacen cosas que sirvan al planeta tierra ecologias. No entienden que la guerra no conduce a nada. ODIO a todos los militares del mundo.... :46:

literally invisible? but i can still see them

@wipal: because usually wars aren't fought in temperate deciduous forests; they (at least the last 50 years) have been fought in barren or tropical shitholes.

And, while mossy oak does work GREAT in those specific dim light/heavily wooded 2nd-growth forests (ie most forests in the US), they generally stand out brightly in the dark, in old-growth forests, and in any non-wooded setting - ie, mossy oak is only useful in a very, very narrow range of conditions, while army uniforms have to be broadly useful across lots of conditions.

these are hunters, you can see them, you cant see soldiers

these are fat rednecks

Camouflage has come a long way in recent years. The digital camo worn by the military is pretty effective.

Mossy Oak, Realtree, etc have experimented with military camo in the past, but have found that it's more profitable to sell to outdoor enthusiasts.

styopa - Wars the US have fought haven't occurred in 'daylight' since 1987.