Log in
Sign up
Login
Recover password
Login
New Hope 1977 vs Hew Hope 2004 (122 pics)
Category:
Pics
|
23 Sep, 2010 |
Views: 38596
|
+102
|
New Hope, the first part of the Star Wars movies, was released in 1977. It was re-released in 2004 with modern effects and animation added to the movie. Here are the changes made to a New Hope compared to original.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
№1
Author:
Slugsie
(23 Sep 2010 01:44) Total user comments:
1588
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
For the most part I think the 2004 versions look much better - cleaner crisper and more colourful. Mind you there seem to be many things where effects where added simply for the sake of adding them.
Reply
Send a message
№2
Author:
fluorescentG
(23 Sep 2010 02:13) Total user comments:
3959
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
genius. get all the fans to buy again and again
Reply
Send a message
№3
Author:
Maddogz
(23 Sep 2010 02:18) Total user comments:
404
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
Very neat comparison of how movie tech has evolved. I feel sorry for whoever had to find all these differences and then take a photo of them though.
Reply
Send a message
№4
Author:
adzhoe
(23 Sep 2010 02:47) Total user comments:
15111
Status:
Activity rewards:
+4
yeah, a hell of a lot of work, of course i have both versions!
Reply
Send a message
№5
Author:
Spiro
(23 Sep 2010 08:54) Total user comments:
717
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
I don't like cgi creatures added in 2004
, for the overall color etc quality thumbs up 2004
Reply
Send a message
№6
Author:
Link was here
(23 Sep 2010 10:27) Total user comments:
1329
Status:
Activity rewards:
+4
Some of the pictures looked like photobombs! There is a lizard/dinosaur like creature that appears in most of the new photos...
Reply
Send a message
№7
Author:
nico
(23 Sep 2010 13:34) Total user comments:
3050
Status:
Activity rewards:
-4
Reply
Send a message
№8
Author:
2fuzzy
(23 Sep 2010 14:59) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
The 2004 version was supposedly to allow Lucas to do things that he wanted to do the first time, but could not. Now lets see how they spin the BR version when it comes out... and yes I will buy it just like I did the others
Reply
Send a message
№9
Author:
astroboy3000
(23 Sep 2010 17:01) Total user comments:
2543
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
i prefer starship troopers
Reply
Send a message
№10
Author:
Naphia
(23 Sep 2010 17:25) Total user comments:
1071
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Now I want to see the old version, too. Of course the colors are more beautiful in the 2004 version, but the 1977 has this charm of old fashioned special effects.
Reply
Send a message
№11
Author:
Tommyfilth
(23 Sep 2010 18:53) Total user comments:
264
Status:
Activity rewards:
+6
The folks at Red Letter Media said it best: nobody has the balls to tell George Lucas his ideas might not be well-advised. They treat him like he is infallible, and never challenge anything he decides he wants to do. Back in the 1970's and 1980's, this wasn't the case, and as a result, the Star Wars movies were well-developed, interesting, and engaging. The re-releases and prequels suffered badly from Lucas-can't-be-wrong syndrome.
Reply
Send a message
№12
Author:
Lu
(23 Sep 2010 20:10) Total user comments:
15132
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
The moment I see it, I will know.
Reply
Send a message
№13
Author:
Nsibai
(23 Sep 2010 22:19) Total user comments:
5694
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№14
Author:
Jimmy Johnson
(23 Sep 2010 23:47) Total user comments:
5518
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Way to milk another $200 million from a 27 year old dead horse, George.
Reply
Send a message
№15
Author:
Governator
(24 Sep 2010 01:28) Total user comments:
653
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
is there anybody that did not give up on this post half way through and scrolled down quickly???
I get it,..there are subtle differences and some not so subtle...but 122 pics ..really?
Reply
Send a message
№16
Author:
raymond.wendt
(24 Sep 2010 05:38) Total user comments:
9115
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№17
Author:
joffenbaker
(24 Sep 2010 22:25) Total user comments:
4968
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
@: Governator, I sure did WTF, who cares... not me plus I'm pissed because Jimmy Johnson could have offered a better critique. Though he's a little more long winded,...he's right.
This post would be better off filled with the"History of Donkey Rides"
Reply
Send a message
№18
Author:
Dust
(25 Sep 2010 00:11) Total user comments:
235
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Next Lucas film: "New Hope 3D"
Reply
Send a message
№19
Author:
Cewre
(29 Jan 2011 07:53) Total user comments:
568
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
2004 wins
Reply
Send a message
Add comment
Name:
E-Mail:
bold
italic
underlined
strike
Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image:
|
