Log in
Sign up
Login
Recover password
Login
Photos by NASA (100 pics)
Category:
Pics
|
2 Aug, 2010 |
Views: 15259
|
+53
|
A very interesting collection of photographs mady by NASA.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Source
№1
Author:
Sokay
(2 Aug 2010 01:34) Total user comments:
237
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Buzz Lightyear
Nasa is so cool
Reply
Send a message
№2
Author:
NeMa
(2 Aug 2010 03:10) Total user comments:
720
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
nice pics!
Reply
Send a message
№3
Author:
bruce88lee
(2 Aug 2010 05:07) Total user comments:
1818
Status:
Activity rewards:
-2
Reply
Send a message
№4
Author:
lepsy
(2 Aug 2010 05:46) Total user comments:
1252
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Look at the capsule reentry burn ...
Reply
Send a message
№5
Author:
astroboy3000
(2 Aug 2010 06:19) Total user comments:
2543
Status:
Activity rewards:
-2
funny isn't it ? every picture of space nasa releases there are never any stars.
Reply
Send a message
№6
Author:
Jimmy Johnson
(2 Aug 2010 06:55) Total user comments:
5518
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
You do realize there has been no advancement in jet propulsion in over 75 years? Man went to the moon in 1967 and they did it on technology that was already 20 years old...
The F-22 Raptor is a +20 year old design, for example. It's taken over two decades of development before the plane ever made it to government approval and therefore, production.
Reply
Send a message
№7
Author:
reidar
(2 Aug 2010 09:02) Total user comments:
123
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
awesome. I hope I will be still alive when space travelling becomes available to an average man.
Reply
Send a message
№8
Author:
galz
(2 Aug 2010 10:29) Total user comments:
2043
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Reply
Send a message
№9
Author:
Jinxaruny
(2 Aug 2010 13:57) Total user comments:
10324
Status:
Activity rewards:
-1
Reply
Send a message
№10
Author:
fluorescentG
(2 Aug 2010 14:46) Total user comments:
3959
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
there will be an "elevator" someday to get to the space station..
Reply
Send a message
№11
Author:
2fuzzy
(2 Aug 2010 15:03) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
astroboy - it is an issue of exposure. When you take a picture of something big and bright in the foreground the items in background don't show up.
Reply
Send a message
№12
Author:
pety
(2 Aug 2010 15:25) Total user comments:
581
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№13
Author:
Lu
(2 Aug 2010 18:03) Total user comments:
15132
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
Awesome technology. Receive a hand, America.
Reply
Send a message
№14
Author:
motenaidayo
(2 Aug 2010 19:10) Total user comments:
886
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
Reply
Send a message
№15
Author:
astroboy3000
(3 Aug 2010 00:25) Total user comments:
2543
Status:
Activity rewards:
-3
no it isn't fuzzy. quit trying to be clever and just put up another one of your damn smileys.
Reply
Send a message
№16
Author:
peterflynn
(3 Aug 2010 01:23) Total user comments:
958
Status:
Activity rewards:
+2
Wow astroboy... sounds like you really know what you're talking about! Oh wait, you didn't actually explain anything did you.
What 2fuzzy's talking about should be glaringly obvious (pun intended) to anyone that's seen the night sky in the city vs the country. Heck, just use any old camera to look at the horizon during twilight and shift slightly up or down and you'll see how much of the sky you can see change depending on the focus.
Reply
Send a message
№17
Author:
2fuzzy
(3 Aug 2010 01:36) Total user comments:
10400
Status:
Activity rewards:
+2
Thanks Peter, and not that this will help... but if he will not listen to others who do know what they are talking about a quick Google shows what NASA has to say about it.
What has probably caused some of this confusion is that in the typical photo or video image from space, there aren't any stars. This is because the stars are much dimmer than the astronaut, Moon, space station, or whatever the image is been taken of. It is extremely hard to get the exposure correct to show the stars.
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa
_star.html (#5)
Now lets all wait for astroboy to apologize.
Reply
Send a message
№18
Author:
ddubia
(3 Aug 2010 03:59) Total user comments:
326
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
Yeah 2fuzzy, it's pretty darn simple unless one is a conspiracy nut like our astroboy must be. You take any picture, anywhere outside at night, with bright lights nearby and there won't be any stars in it. The bright lights cause an overexposure and block out the camera's ability to capture the tiny stars.
But those who want to believe the government is falsifying space evidence will believe the nuts who claim foul.
I suppose NASA "forgot" to add in the stars in every picture they've taken. It just slipped their minds I guess. hahaha
It's the same nuts who claim the shadows on the moon are fake because shadows should all be aiming in the same direction. But look outside on any bright day and one will see that shadows don't do that. They aim in many different directions. Always away from the light source, but not in the exact same direction.
They sound like they make logical sense enough to sucker-in those who aren't thinking for themselves and love the idea of catching the government's "attempts" at fooling us. But any short and quick study on these topics will reveal that astroboy and his cohorts are only looking the fools themselves.
Reply
Send a message
№19
Author:
adzhoe
(3 Aug 2010 05:05) Total user comments:
15114
Status:
Activity rewards:
+1
basic light theory of photograhic principles is all.
Reply
Send a message
№20
Author:
peterflynn
(4 Aug 2010 19:51) Total user comments:
958
Status:
Activity rewards:
0
This is one of my favorite conspiracy fails
Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=_c6HsiixFS8
Reply
Send a message
Add comment
Name:
E-Mail:
bold
italic
underlined
strike
Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image: