USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Oct 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 

October 2017 (496)
September 2017 (696)
August 2017 (760)
July 2017 (693)
June 2017 (726)
May 2017 (727)

Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 20 Jul, 2017  |
  • Views: 9018  |
  • Like
  • +74
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

This guy has just had enough of Twitter, so he decided to roast them.

1 Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)


2 Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)


3 Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)


4 Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)


5 Guy Uses Twitter To Call Out PETA (6 pics)






Do you like it?




№1 Author: Nick1090 (20 Jul 2017 13:00) Total user comments: 1254


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
People Eating Tasty Animals
  Reply       
№2 Author: EnderWiggin (22 Jul 2017 00:10) Total user comments: 375


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -12
  • Like
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.

1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.

BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.
  Reply       
№3 Author: SFLAG (26 Jul 2017 01:05) Total user comments: 24


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Quote: EnderWiggin
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.

1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.

BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.


I'm not sure how you think any of that is a devastating take-down.

It's my understanding that PETA isn't in the business of "saving animals" at all. They are in the business of "ending animal slavery" etc., which means they don't think animals should be pets, and would prefer that dogs and cats (for instance) be euthanized than be "slaves" (aka pets).
  Reply       
№4 Author: EnderWiggin (3 Aug 2017 02:37) Total user comments: 375


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Quote: SFLAG
Quote: EnderWiggin
Get your facts straight before you try to play journalist jackass.

1.)In 2016 PETA could not house 71.9% of their animals and euthanized the animals who would have already been euthanized without PETA's involvement. They at least had a chance they wouldn't have otherwise had.
2.) PETA has euthanized 17,001 animals since 2007; mostly senior and hard to place animals.
3.) The rest is just PR stunts designed to draw attention to the organization, which has clearly worked.

BTW, PETA only spend about 1.25% of its finances on operating expenses. Get your head out of your ass Calum McSwiggan.


I'm not sure how you think any of that is a devastating take-down.

It's my understanding that PETA isn't in the business of "saving animals" at all. They are in the business of "ending animal slavery" etc., which means they don't think animals should be pets, and would prefer that dogs and cats (for instance) be euthanized than be "slaves" (aka pets).


Facts are facts. If they are not accurate, they are not facts. Simple as that.
  Reply       
№5 Author: kryptor (8 Aug 2017 06:34) Total user comments: 4700


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Out of shear spite, I'm going to have a Bacon, Egg and Cheese sandwich.

74
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: