USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (164)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 22 Apr, 2010  |
  • Views: 17843  |
  • Like
  • +59
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

You can order a bomb shelter like this if you have extra 10 million dollars.
But why would you need one?


1 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


2 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


3 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


4 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


5 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)




6 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


7 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


8 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


9 Modern Bomb Shelter (9 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: MissGinette (22 Apr 2010 02:47) Total user comments: 612


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
2012 is coming!! 34
  Reply       
№2 Author: Jimmy Johnson (22 Apr 2010 02:51) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Preying on human insecurities is where the whole "terrorist" industry evolved from.

There has been a very recent court ruling by a US Supreme Court Justice that the Second Amendment applies to the rights of a militia, not to the individual. Militias must be endorsed by it's government in order to exist.
  Reply       
№3 Author: Louie (22 Apr 2010 03:00) Total user comments: 8189


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
AHHHH!!!
  Reply       
№4 Author: the_dado_666 (22 Apr 2010 05:50) Total user comments: 2350


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№5 Author: ikei (22 Apr 2010 07:33) Total user comments: 444


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№6 Author: roughrider7 (22 Apr 2010 09:07) Total user comments: 40


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
War is over if you want it.
  Reply       
№7 Author: Cewre (22 Apr 2010 11:12) Total user comments: 567


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I like it!
  Reply       
№8 Author: Nibbles (22 Apr 2010 11:39) Total user comments: 211


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
"2012 is coming". And hundreds of prophesies like that one has already come and gone and I'm still here. WTF...
  Reply       
№9 Author: salsapopo (22 Apr 2010 11:53) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
cool cost crazy
  Reply       
№10 Author: superNought (22 Apr 2010 15:26) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Quote: Jimmy Johnson
There has been a very recent court ruling by a US Supreme Court Justice that the Second Amendment applies to the rights of a militia, not to the individual. Militias must be endorsed by it's government in order to exist.

If you are talking about the Heller vs. DC case you are mistaken. It applies to the individual. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D
istrict_of_Columbia_v._Heller
  Reply       
№11 Author: 2fuzzy (22 Apr 2010 15:58) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
13
  Reply       
№12 Author: khannibal (22 Apr 2010 17:34) Total user comments: 4711


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
02
  Reply       
№13 Author: 101 (22 Apr 2010 18:12) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
War,war never changes...
  Reply       
№14 Author: NATAS (22 Apr 2010 20:36) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool, just think of four connected together.
  Reply       
№15 Author: Tommyfilth (22 Apr 2010 20:37) Total user comments: 264


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
2012 has absolutely nothing to do with the end of the world, folks. Stop watching TV and learn some FACTS. 12/21/2012 11:11 AM GMT has to do ONLY with changing over into a new Baktun on the Mayan Long Count Calendar. It marks the changeover into a new age in the Zodiac, the Age of Aquarius.
  Reply       
№16 Author: kngsrule (22 Apr 2010 21:27) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Tommyfilth - I love you!!!!!
  Reply       
№17 Author: Jimmy Johnson (24 Apr 2010 05:58) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
supeerNpought -

The DC vs Heller decision was on June 26, 2008. On March 10, 2010 the Massachusetts Supreme Court handed down it's ruling in Commonwealth vs Richard Runyan. There was not one dissenting vote - Every judge sitting on the Massachusetts' Supreme Court agreed with this decision.

The court ruled AGAINST the Second Amendment as being an individual right. They concluded the Supreme Court's decision in DC vs Heller warranted a dismissal, citing violation of G.L. c. 140, paragragh 131L (a). That the two premises of the DC vs Heller ruling were in error.
  Reply       
№18 Author: patriot (25 Apr 2010 03:58) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Jimmy Johnson,
What part of "..... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Don't you understand? Examine the bill of rights and the founding fathers and you will better understand what our rights are. Too many just don't know and believe whatever they hear on the boob tube.
  Reply       
№19 Author: Jimmy Johnson (25 Apr 2010 05:29) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Hey patriot - Why don't you put that question on a postcard and send it to the Massachusetts Supreme Court?

How am I supposed to answer that question for you, exactly?

What part of me not having any decision in Commonwealth vs Richard Runyan don't yoiu understand?

You're right that too many people don't know.... You should include yourself in that company. It's a matter of public record now, if you bothered to do your own research. I thought my post was quite explicit. You could've referenced any part of it on a search engine. Typical.
  Reply       
№20 Author: Ty Webb (25 Apr 2010 23:23) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
MissGinette,
So is christmas.
Oh and I would have to support Jimmy. I have been reading his comments for a while and I find that he is pretty accurate in his submissions, level headed and seems to really research or at least he has quite a head on his shoulders and is well educated. I have never seen him offer any information by just guessing or bull shitting. He is one of the few people here at Acid Cow that I always read his comments.
  Reply       
№21 Author: Tommyfilth (26 Apr 2010 16:49) Total user comments: 264


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Wow, an admonishment from Ty Webb! That's about as valuable as a Cable Ace Award.
  Reply       
№22 Author: mahedi (3 Mar 2012 17:58) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Nice cool place
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: