USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Jul 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 

July 2017 (495)
June 2017 (726)
May 2017 (727)
April 2017 (659)
March 2017 (752)
February 2017 (653)

World's First Things (16 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 4 Mar, 2014  |
  • Views: 20764  |
  • Like
  • +81
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Those are the world's first things.

1 World's First Things (16 pics)


2 World's First Things (16 pics)


3 World's First Things (16 pics)


4 World's First Things (16 pics)


5 World's First Things (16 pics)



6 World's First Things (16 pics)


7 World's First Things (16 pics)


8 World's First Things (16 pics)


9 World's First Things (16 pics)


10 World's First Things (16 pics)


11 World's First Things (16 pics)


12 World's First Things (16 pics)


13 World's First Things (16 pics)


14 World's First Things (16 pics)


15 World's First Things (16 pics)


16 World's First Things (16 pics)

Source


Do you like it?




№1 Author: candysack (4 Mar 2014 04:39) Total user comments: 1436


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
i would have loved to listen to mix tape of my pictures in the car :08:
  Reply       
№2 Author: Slugsie (4 Mar 2014 15:01) Total user comments: 1557


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
#15 Interesting reading the first article description, appears to suggest that 'lad' was used to refer to a female rather than a male.
  Reply       
№3 Author: Vladimir Harkonnen (4 Mar 2014 17:18) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Slugsie,
It's 'lady', not 'lad' printed there.
  Reply       
№4 Author: mobius (4 Mar 2014 18:06) Total user comments: 1073


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool!
  Reply       
№5 Author: Lu (4 Mar 2014 18:10) Total user comments: 15098


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
C'mon you jackass scientists, we need more new things.
  Reply       
№6 Author: saint357 (4 Mar 2014 19:35) Total user comments: 2366


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow some really harsh people today! :02:
  Reply       
№7 Author: YeahRight (4 Mar 2014 22:49) Total user comments: 1649


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
...COOL!!! :12: :04: :12:
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: