USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (66)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

World's First Things (16 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 4 Mar, 2014  |
  • Views: 18463  |
  • Like
  • +70
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Those are the world's first things.

1 World's First Things (16 pics)


2 World's First Things (16 pics)


3 World's First Things (16 pics)


4 World's First Things (16 pics)


5 World's First Things (16 pics)




6 World's First Things (16 pics)


7 World's First Things (16 pics)


8 World's First Things (16 pics)


9 World's First Things (16 pics)


10 World's First Things (16 pics)


11 World's First Things (16 pics)


12 World's First Things (16 pics)


13 World's First Things (16 pics)


14 World's First Things (16 pics)


15 World's First Things (16 pics)


16 World's First Things (16 pics)

Source


Do you like it?



№1 Author: candysack (4 Mar 2014 04:39) Total user comments: 1436


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
i would have loved to listen to mix tape of my pictures in the car :08:
  Reply       
№2 Author: Slugsie (4 Mar 2014 15:01) Total user comments: 1519


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
#15 Interesting reading the first article description, appears to suggest that 'lad' was used to refer to a female rather than a male.
  Reply       
№3 Author: Vladimir Harkonnen (4 Mar 2014 17:18) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Slugsie,
It's 'lady', not 'lad' printed there.
  Reply       
№4 Author: mobius (4 Mar 2014 18:06) Total user comments: 1073


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool!
  Reply       
№5 Author: Lu (4 Mar 2014 18:10) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
C'mon you jackass scientists, we need more new things.
  Reply       
№6 Author: saint357 (4 Mar 2014 19:35) Total user comments: 2366


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow some really harsh people today! :02:
  Reply       
№7 Author: YeahRight (4 Mar 2014 22:49) Total user comments: 1632


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
...COOL!!! :12: :04: :12:
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: