USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (66)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 16 Aug, 2013  |
  • Views: 34937  |
  • Like
  • +102
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

You might also like:
Very Interesting Photos (21 pics)


1 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


2 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


3 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


4 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


5 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)




6 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


7 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


8 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


9 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


10 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


11 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


12 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


13 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


14 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


15 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


16 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)


17 Very Interesting Photos. Part 2 (17 pics)

Source


Do you like it?



№1 Author: 1234 (16 Aug 2013 02:30) Total user comments: 1878


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
:15: woooaaahhh look at that chimp...i think his juicing...it be cool to see this chimp and that kangaroo with big arms ....arm wrestle

i like pic 13...maybe cause i seen notebook but i kinda think like that too :04:
  Reply       
№2 Author: maajeq (16 Aug 2013 13:39) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +6
  • Like
If that's 7 times lighter than air than it would go up not lay on the flower...???
  Reply       
№3 Author: styopa (16 Aug 2013 16:34) Total user comments: 957


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +4
  • Like
#1 it looks spacious, because it is. A Washington/CLE flight back then was ~$75, which equals $400 today (you can get a flight today for typically $100) So today, if you really want to spend 4x the normal price, you can sit in first class...and get space/service like the picture.

  Reply       
№4 Author: M. (16 Aug 2013 18:17) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
#15 is not realistic. The galaxies are not that color when photographed, and are later colored in by graphic "artists".
  Reply       
№5 Author: foxmurder (16 Aug 2013 18:58) Total user comments: 31


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
#3: if it were lighter that the air, it would fly away... false.
  Reply       
№6 Author: Lu (16 Aug 2013 22:17) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
#3 Fancy materiel, don't you know.
  Reply       
№7 Author: Snark (16 Aug 2013 23:01) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
Quote: styopa
Washington/CLE flight


Wrong. Try $500 for the average economy class Washington/CLE flight today. Specials are around $200.

For first class it's $1,000.

It's called Google, it's not expensive.
  Reply       
№8 Author: Louie (17 Aug 2013 02:04) Total user comments: 8189


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow
  Reply       
№9 Author: zetz (17 Aug 2013 17:56) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
maajeq,
what about a gravity?


#3: if it were lighter that the air, it would fly away... false.

how can it fly away when there is gravity?
  Reply       
№10 Author: adzhoe (17 Aug 2013 19:43) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
let the debate continue...
  Reply       
№11 Author: joffenbaker (18 Aug 2013 02:59) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
I call Bullshit on 747's in the 60's
I call bullshit on # 3 It seems as though this is the first time anyone has heard of this. Does NASA know about this and does it have any use? It looks like a giant cigar ash.
  Reply       
№12 Author: MWarrior (18 Aug 2013 03:25) Total user comments: 993


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
"I call bullshit on # 3 It seems as though this is the first time anyone has heard of this"

I just Googled it- it was just actually invented just a few months ago.
  Reply       
№13 Author: Aindy (18 Aug 2013 11:20) Total user comments: 2780


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
zetz,
ARE YOU SERIOUS????????? :13:

You are one of those people we make fun of on acidcow ffs........ :17:
  Reply       
№14 Author: bigdaddy2013 (21 Aug 2013 16:56) Total user comments: 712


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
#9,Iam sooooooooooo wasted!!!!!!!!!!!!! :60:
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: