USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Aug 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 

August 2017 (462)
July 2017 (693)
June 2017 (726)
May 2017 (727)
April 2017 (659)
March 2017 (752)

72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 5 Aug, 2013  |
  • Views: 4193  |
  • Like
  • +19
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

72 million-year-old dinosaur discovered in the desert of northern Mexico.

1 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)


2 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)


3 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)


4 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)


5 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)



6 72 Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Remains (7 pics)




Do you like it?




№1 Author: 1234 (5 Aug 2013 10:09) Total user comments: 1878


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wonder how many things the cartels disposed of...they found b4 this :07: wait the cartels don't even bother any more
  Reply       
№2 Author: amcjau (5 Aug 2013 14:11) Total user comments: 885


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
get the dino a taco, he'll be fine
  Reply       
№3 Author: micliapu (5 Aug 2013 15:06) Total user comments: 2977


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
72 millions years ago ? that's mind blow number :01:
  Reply       
№4 Author: babis (5 Aug 2013 15:21) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
bill hicks said it better
  Reply       
№5 Author: Lu (5 Aug 2013 21:38) Total user comments: 15098


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Pics 2 - 7 looks like pic 1?
  Reply       
№6 Author: Hott_RoDD (5 Aug 2013 22:29) Total user comments: 292


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
I'm tired of this so called "scientists" throwing numbers as if they really knew how old those remains were..all their dating methods fail, don't take my word search it your self :25:
  Reply       
№7 Author: Slugsie (6 Aug 2013 01:08) Total user comments: 1560


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
@Hott RoDD, actually scientific methods of dating old stuff are very robust. They usually use multiple methods to reduce the chances of error. If you actually did some research into how dating methods work, and how they came about, and the science that supports them to begin with you wouldn't dismiss them quite so easily.

If you think you can prove that their methods don't work then why don't you write a paper with your evidence and submit it for review. You never know, if you are actually right you could be the founder of a new branch of science.

Or are you one of these idiots who thinks the world is 6-10 thousands years old and thinks a single book of dubious origin is a valid source?
  Reply       
№8 Author: Jinxaruny (10 Aug 2013 22:41) Total user comments: 10324


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Wish this could be my job!
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: