USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (131)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Interesting Math Riddle

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 1 Oct, 2009  |
  • Views: 7809  |
  • Like
  • +26
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

64 = 65?
How is it possible?

1 Interesting Math Riddle


Do you like it?



№1 Author: tapatio (1 Oct 2009 04:19) Total user comments: 2047


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
all the lines together make up or loose the extra square..
  Reply       
№2 Author: ash666 (1 Oct 2009 06:37) Total user comments: 1856


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
its just like 1=2 i know how to prove it
  Reply       
№3 Author: unknownj (1 Oct 2009 10:15) Total user comments: 427


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
its a paradox, it can be solved with Fibonacci numbers.

it isn't so logical, you have to draw a square with 64 little areas and cut them in pieces and rearrange them. you just will see a little square so you'll count 65 but when you calculate its 64.

paradoxes are fun 45
  Reply       
№4 Author: salsapopo (1 Oct 2009 10:38) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
ash666,
2
  Reply       
№5 Author: mudassargold (1 Oct 2009 13:22) Total user comments: 1951


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
It's not a mystery
  Reply       
№6 Author: Don (1 Oct 2009 17:07) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
It's fairly simple, the outside area isn't perfectly square. The extra area adds up to about 1 cube, which is visible when rearranged properly.
  Reply       
№7 Author: Ty Webb (1 Oct 2009 17:25) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
my cat's name is mittens
  Reply       
№8 Author: Grunt Callahan (1 Oct 2009 20:41) Total user comments: 2284


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I'm thinking of buying a yo-yo
  Reply       
№9 Author: LamSchaap (2 Oct 2009 16:12) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
http://www.imgdumper.nl/upload
s2/4ac617e6bdf02/4ac617e6b0058
-Afbeelding_10.png

FAIL!!!
  Reply       
№10 Author: reixo (2 Oct 2009 22:02) Total user comments: 194


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
3+3=7
Nothing to be proven here, it's just common sense
  Reply       
№11 Author: Mike Pooposterous (4 Nov 2009 06:00) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
The slopes don't match. 2/5 != 3/8
The shapes don't fit together properly.
  Reply       
№12 Author: john smith (20 Dec 2009 22:26) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wtf
  Reply       
№13 Author: 2fuzzy (18 Oct 2010 16:11) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
old trick
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: