USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (164)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Space Shuttle Crash Test (3 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 31 Oct, 2011  |
  • Views: 13975  |
  • Like
  • +50
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

OMG, it looks even cooler than world's fastest crash test.

1 Space Shuttle Crash Test (3 pics)


2 Space Shuttle Crash Test (3 pics)


3 Space Shuttle Crash Test (3 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: alex_667 (31 Oct 2011 00:34) Total user comments: 37


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +4
  • Like
Pardon me for being an idiot but, what's the fucking point?
If you hit a wall at 100 trillion kilometers per hour or whatever speed that shuttle can reach, it's pretty fucking obvious what's going to happen to it. It's designed to go into space which is a huge place. Theres a pretty small possibility that it will crash into something.
You'd think scientists are smarter than that.

88
  Reply       
№2 Author: mn97lsc (31 Oct 2011 01:02) Total user comments: 2


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +30
  • Like
I'm pretty sure that isn't the space shuttle, but i does look like a F-4 Phantom fighter jet. They are more than likely testing some type of new concrete material for buildings and trying to see if it will hold up to a plane strike.
  Reply       
№3 Author: DocMcCoy (31 Oct 2011 01:27) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
2 good points of view. 04
  Reply       
№4 Author: StoneTalon (31 Oct 2011 02:59) Total user comments: 123


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
I'm sure when it's scientists involved they're testing a whole bunch of things, both obvious and not. Hahah i like how it's the only three pictures you need. Before, during, after. 07
  Reply       
№5 Author: miscellaneous (31 Oct 2011 03:15) Total user comments: 4179


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
I wish there was a source link, I would like to know more about this.

maybe they just like to blow shit up?
  Reply       
№6 Author: asep.gelo (31 Oct 2011 05:35) Total user comments: 146


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
crash test? the only one space shuttle will crash is earth. 17
  Reply       
№7 Author: synyster616 (31 Oct 2011 09:03) Total user comments: 373


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
No video? disappointing 02
  Reply       
№8 Author: MathIsHard (31 Oct 2011 09:24) Total user comments: 1404


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +8
  • Like
they're actually testing the wall. when they built the nuclear power plant near San Diego California they wanted to make sure the cooling towers (which look like big boobs, heh) could survive a plane being flown into them (they were built way before 9/11). for more info look up san onofre



tl;dr: mn97lsc is right 04
  Reply       
№9 Author: Governator (31 Oct 2011 09:33) Total user comments: 653


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +4
  • Like
no space shuttle, and the test is done to test the wall. got it. that makes more sense 04
  Reply       
№10 Author: jai9313 (31 Oct 2011 09:41) Total user comments: 894


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
no video sh*t
  Reply       
№11 Author: Nsibai (31 Oct 2011 10:38) Total user comments: 5694


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№12 Author: quackers (31 Oct 2011 11:34) Total user comments: 4830


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
that was a little Obvious was it not,.,.,.,
  Reply       
№13 Author: MajorPanic (31 Oct 2011 11:51) Total user comments: 146


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
F-4 not the shuttle.
  Reply       
№14 Author: Eek-a (31 Oct 2011 12:26) Total user comments: 315


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Fireball XL5 it is not.
  Reply       
№15 Author: thesoulshaker (31 Oct 2011 13:50) Total user comments: 1384


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№16 Author: m0ck0 (31 Oct 2011 14:34) Total user comments: 148


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
thats not a space shuttle. those wings are too big, or body too small

http://www.militaryphotos.net/
forums/showthread.php?144811-W
arplanes-destroyed

whoever said f4 was right
  Reply       
№17 Author: fairmania (31 Oct 2011 14:50) Total user comments: 1436


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Yep, it's an F4.

I think the basic premis of the whole experiment is, that given the chance to fly into a huge concrete lump, just don't!

It'll all end in tears......
  Reply       
№18 Author: Slugsie (31 Oct 2011 14:56) Total user comments: 1520


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Wow. Just wow. Which idiot can't tell the difference between a Space Shuttle and a Fighter Jet (F4 Phantom in this case)?
  Reply       
№19 Author: jasonbo (31 Oct 2011 15:42) Total user comments: 8


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Penis



(sorry had to be said)
  Reply       
№20 Author: SheepsInn (31 Oct 2011 15:50) Total user comments: 931


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Whats the point of a crash test???? 13
  Reply       
№21 Author: makarrao (31 Oct 2011 16:30) Total user comments: 242


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
testing the wall
  Reply       
№22 Author: Lu (31 Oct 2011 19:51) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Impressive pics.
  Reply       
№23 Author: DeadlyNinja (31 Oct 2011 20:49) Total user comments: 96


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wish there is another pic of the wall after =o
  Reply       
№24 Author: salsapopo (2 Nov 2011 00:26) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wooow cool to see from near
  Reply       
№25 Author: raymond.wendt (20 Nov 2011 05:06) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow. hard to believe something like that could ever happen.
  Reply       
№26 Author: adzhoe (3 Dec 2011 08:32) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
cool pics. terrible caption.
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: