USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Jan 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 

January 2017 (396)
December 2016 (725)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)

Web Page from the Back (5 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 20 Apr, 2011  |
  • Views: 6937  |
  • Like
  • -12
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

This is how a webpage looks from the back.

1 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


2 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


3 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


4 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)




Do you like it?



№1 Author: raymond.wendt (20 Apr 2011 02:16) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
that's a clever idea. I like how the flicker page looks like the back of a picture
  Reply       
№2 Author: TheIronSea (20 Apr 2011 02:18) Total user comments: 1015


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
... No sense.
  Reply       
№3 Author: capt.huffnpuff (20 Apr 2011 05:40) Total user comments: 2801


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Shouln't iSite be backwards? 51
  Reply       
№4 Author: krankoloji (20 Apr 2011 10:54) Total user comments: 591


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
turn it 180 degrees, and voila.
  Reply       
№5 Author: mahedi (20 Apr 2011 11:24) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Nicw idea
  Reply       
№6 Author: Shadoglare (20 Apr 2011 15:51) Total user comments: 499


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Lame.
  Reply       
№7 Author: t0t0t0 (20 Apr 2011 16:45) Total user comments: 429


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Shadoglare,
I couldn't agree more... this is too lame
  Reply       
№8 Author: Lu (20 Apr 2011 19:00) Total user comments: 15085


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
. . . eh? . .
  Reply       
№9 Author: ScrappyCoco (20 Apr 2011 19:34) Total user comments: 34


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
06
  Reply       
№10 Author: niniel5 (20 Apr 2011 20:28) Total user comments: 89


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
what's the point?
  Reply       
№11 Author: PyroSA (20 Apr 2011 21:19) Total user comments: 75


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Google and Twitter was just stupid.

The other three at least offered something interesting.
  Reply       
№12 Author: Benmarvin (21 Apr 2011 04:12) Total user comments: 30


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Lame
  Reply       
№13 Author: compmaster (22 Apr 2011 03:40) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№14 Author: Shay (24 Apr 2011 22:10) Total user comments: 1267


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Lame and pointless
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: