USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Jul 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 

July 2017 (660)
June 2017 (726)
May 2017 (727)
April 2017 (659)
March 2017 (752)
February 2017 (653)

Web Page from the Back (5 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 20 Apr, 2011  |
  • Views: 7222  |
  • Like
  • -10
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

This is how a webpage looks from the back.

1 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


2 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


3 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)


4 Web Page from the Back (5 pics)




Do you like it?




№1 Author: raymond.wendt (20 Apr 2011 02:16) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
that's a clever idea. I like how the flicker page looks like the back of a picture
  Reply       
№2 Author: TheIronSea (20 Apr 2011 02:18) Total user comments: 1015


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
... No sense.
  Reply       
№3 Author: capt.huffnpuff (20 Apr 2011 05:40) Total user comments: 2801


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Shouln't iSite be backwards? 51
  Reply       
№4 Author: krankoloji (20 Apr 2011 10:54) Total user comments: 591


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
turn it 180 degrees, and voila.
  Reply       
№5 Author: mahedi (20 Apr 2011 11:24) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Nicw idea
  Reply       
№6 Author: Shadoglare (20 Apr 2011 15:51) Total user comments: 501


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Lame.
  Reply       
№7 Author: t0t0t0 (20 Apr 2011 16:45) Total user comments: 429


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Shadoglare,
I couldn't agree more... this is too lame
  Reply       
№8 Author: Lu (20 Apr 2011 19:00) Total user comments: 15098


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
. . . eh? . .
  Reply       
№9 Author: ScrappyCoco (20 Apr 2011 19:34) Total user comments: 34


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
06
  Reply       
№10 Author: niniel5 (20 Apr 2011 20:28) Total user comments: 89


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
what's the point?
  Reply       
№11 Author: PyroSA (20 Apr 2011 21:19) Total user comments: 75


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Google and Twitter was just stupid.

The other three at least offered something interesting.
  Reply       
№12 Author: Benmarvin (21 Apr 2011 04:12) Total user comments: 30


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Lame
  Reply       
№13 Author: compmaster (22 Apr 2011 03:40) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№14 Author: Shay (24 Apr 2011 22:10) Total user comments: 1283


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Lame and pointless
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: