USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (66)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 11 Mar, 2011  |
  • Views: 12570  |
  • Like
  • +55
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Here is light painting WiFi. This is exactly how it looks like in the air. Unfortunately, or fortunately, we can't see it with the naked eye. Because this is what we would see everywhere.

1 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


2 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


3 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


4 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


5 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)




6 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


7 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


8 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)


9 This Is How WiFi Looks Like (9 pics)[/b]

Source


Do you like it?



№1 Author: jP (11 Mar 2011 00:38) Total user comments: 855


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Makes me think of The Matrix.....:)
  Reply       
№2 Author: Dr. Love (11 Mar 2011 01:21) Total user comments: 71


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Makes me think of the Tron bike trail.
  Reply       
№3 Author: Slugsie (11 Mar 2011 01:32) Total user comments: 1519


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
OK, it's an interesting project, but... it in no way shape or form is what Wifi looks like in the air. It's a representation of the signal strength at the point of the detector.
  Reply       
№4 Author: capt.huffnpuff (11 Mar 2011 02:32) Total user comments: 2801


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
No, No. That's the anti-illegal fence on the US border. Lots of holes. 08
  Reply       
№5 Author: noxusrules (11 Mar 2011 03:27) Total user comments: 1052


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№6 Author: GreenVulture.11 (11 Mar 2011 04:25) Total user comments: 19


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
no fkng way 61
  Reply       
№7 Author: miscellaneous (11 Mar 2011 06:39) Total user comments: 4179


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I thought it was pretty neat....
  Reply       
№8 Author: Louie (11 Mar 2011 06:50) Total user comments: 8189


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№9 Author: Lord Dodo (11 Mar 2011 10:46) Total user comments: 2064


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№10 Author: Haro (11 Mar 2011 12:11) Total user comments: 551


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№11 Author: joffenbaker (11 Mar 2011 16:27) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Slugsie is correct signal is in form of wave length (sinusoidal)
  Reply       
№12 Author: choochwhocharlie (11 Mar 2011 17:59) Total user comments: 1963


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
whatever joffenbaker said
  Reply       
№13 Author: mahedi (11 Mar 2011 18:43) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Looking great
  Reply       
№14 Author: bakos (11 Mar 2011 21:57) Total user comments: 188


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
check the source link. "Light painting wifi"
  Reply       
№15 Author: Lu (11 Mar 2011 22:32) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
. . . eh? . .
  Reply       
№16 Author: dustin_is_stoopid (12 Mar 2011 01:35) Total user comments: 149


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
if we cant see wi-fi with the naked eye, then how do we know it looks like this?
  Reply       
№17 Author: adzhoe (12 Mar 2011 03:41) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
...it's just an electronic chain link fence look.
  Reply       
№18 Author: raymond.wendt (12 Mar 2011 14:40) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I can see it and it doesn't look like this.
  Reply       
№19 Author: Kool-Aid (12 Mar 2011 17:02) Total user comments: 175


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool
  Reply       
№20 Author: Ty Webb (13 Mar 2011 22:18) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Slugsie,
way to be the smart tech guy!! 04
welcome to the family Slug. 58
  Reply       
№21 Author: thesoulshaker (14 Mar 2011 06:26) Total user comments: 1384


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№22 Author: 2fuzzy (15 Mar 2011 20:19) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Interesting idea.
  Reply       
№23 Author: Hardwyre (27 Mar 2011 13:57) Total user comments: 58


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
dustin_is_stoopid,
Because we know what a wave length looks like, and we know Wifi is just a type of radio wave length.
  Reply       
№24 Author: compmaster (8 Apr 2011 21:30) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
07
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: