2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 25 Feb, 2011  |
  • Views: 253250  |
  • Like
  • +602
  • Dislike  |
  •  

Strange, but they were so wrong.
stan james promo code 2017




1 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


2 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


3 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


4 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


5 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


6 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


7 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


8 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


9 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


10 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


11 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


12 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


13 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


14 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


15 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


16 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


17 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


18 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


19 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


20 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


21 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


22 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


23 2000 as Seen in 1910 (23 pics)


№1 Author: Andreuss (25 Feb 2011 01:46) Total user comments: 16


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
some ppl seen it coming most of the ideas happened that one guy who saw this in his mind sure was a visonary~ 05
  Reply       
№2 Author: Shay (25 Feb 2011 02:35) Total user comments: 1297


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +18
  • Like
I dont think they were so far off.
Considering the books being pumped into thier brains as an example...wearing a headphone while using the computer would be a very similar thing.
Try to guess what will be here 100 years from now, think of things you cannot even consider, since you haven't seen them yet.

Kids will be born as talking assholes with attitude, instead of waiting til they become teens... 07
  Reply       
№3 Author: astroboy3000 (25 Feb 2011 04:30) Total user comments: 2543


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +11
  • Like
they got the laziness aspect correct
  Reply       
№4 Author: Jockey straddler (25 Feb 2011 04:48) Total user comments: 705


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
Ye old boys got it wrong..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  Reply       
№5 Author: Patty (25 Feb 2011 05:09) Total user comments: 1766


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
Hmmmmmmmmm, imagination is a great thing.
  Reply       
№6 Author: miscellaneous (25 Feb 2011 06:11) Total user comments: 4179


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
some of these are wrong in actuality, but are quite close in concept

armored battle wagons, air ships, planes filling the sky, even an air marshal.

a little visionary if you ask me.... 04
  Reply       
№7 Author: GhostChronos (25 Feb 2011 07:24) Total user comments: 2100


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
woah this post has been made a long time ago...
but a lot of things became true 05
  Reply       
№8 Author: compmaster (25 Feb 2011 10:05) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№9 Author: t0t0t0 (25 Feb 2011 10:58) Total user comments: 429


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
The difference is that we now know what the plans are for ther next 50 years. There are many web portals updating us on what is happening in science and technology.
  Reply       
№10 Author: the_dado_666 (25 Feb 2011 12:57) Total user comments: 2357


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
hahahahahaha 04
  Reply       
№11 Author: Haro (25 Feb 2011 13:31) Total user comments: 551


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№12 Author: GustavoSM (25 Feb 2011 14:11) Total user comments: 396


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Just imagine showing one of these people a smartphone...
  Reply       
№13 Author: choochwhocharlie (25 Feb 2011 14:34) Total user comments: 2136


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
predict the future? Ya............were all gonna die.
10
  Reply       
№14 Author: mahedi (25 Feb 2011 14:41) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
15
  Reply       
№15 Author: joffenbaker (25 Feb 2011 14:55) Total user comments: 4968


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
As a kid I was expecting it to be a little more like the Jetsons
  Reply       
№16 Author: Lord Dodo (25 Feb 2011 15:11) Total user comments: 2064


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
fascinating how they thought the future will be 51 as previous posters said, in concept they got sometimes close, just the design don't match 04
  Reply       
№17 Author: khannibal (25 Feb 2011 15:31) Total user comments: 4711


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
43 43 43 43

43 43 43 43
  Reply       
№18 Author: 2fuzzy (25 Feb 2011 15:40) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +7
  • Like
interesting to see how they saw things change... except their clothes.
  Reply       
№19 Author: kiewfong (25 Feb 2011 16:46) Total user comments: 143


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
wrong very wrong....but the video call is kinda accurate....
  Reply       
№20 Author: Tommyfilth (25 Feb 2011 16:57) Total user comments: 264


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +6
  • Like
Many of these are quite accurate, especially if you don't take them so literally. Others, on the other hand, baffle me. #14, for example. In the year 2000, people will watch horses on stage?
  Reply       
№21 Author: Naphia (25 Feb 2011 17:46) Total user comments: 1071


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +5
  • Like
Imagine people in 100 years seeing pictures how we imagined the future and laughing.
  Reply       
№22 Author: Pilgrim (25 Feb 2011 18:33) Total user comments: 2288


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
Picture phone, Bitches!
  Reply       
№23 Author: itstodd (25 Feb 2011 18:56) Total user comments: 194


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +4
  • Like
because fashion was NEVER going to change....
  Reply       
№24 Author: noxusrules (25 Feb 2011 19:00) Total user comments: 1052


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
13 07
  Reply       
№25 Author: Lu (25 Feb 2011 19:50) Total user comments: 15132


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
We came a long way since.
  Reply       
№26 Author: DocMcCoy (25 Feb 2011 20:00) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
We don't even know what will be going on 25 years from now. I don't think this guy was very far off. OK, the fly by wine bar. 12
  Reply       
№27 Author: Kool-Aid (26 Feb 2011 00:48) Total user comments: 175


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
In every picture, it is written "En L'an 2000" witch is French and translates to "In the year 2000" Not that it was't obvious... 10
  Reply       
№28 Author: Krüzεr ΦΘΩδ∞ (26 Feb 2011 02:59) Total user comments: 62


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
I liked how much clothing evolved 09
  Reply       
№29 Author: Jinxaruny (26 Feb 2011 20:17) Total user comments: 10324


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
07
  Reply       
№30 Author: jai9313 (27 Feb 2011 06:11) Total user comments: 894


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
not so off i think it almost right very close 05
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Insert a video from YouTube
Type the two words shown in the image: