USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (66)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Echoism Faces (12 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 7 Feb, 2011  |
  • Views: 11862  |
  • Like
  • +59
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

These photos are part of the project “Echoism” that focuses on facial symmetry. The subjects were pictured front to carema. As a part of the study, they were asked not to express emotions. Then each photograph was split into a left and a right section with one side to be horizontally flipped, afterwards pictures were recombined to create two separate and symmetrical identities of the person.

1 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


2 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


3 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


4 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


5 Echoism Faces (12 pics)




6 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


7 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


8 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


9 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


10 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


11 Echoism Faces (12 pics)


12 Echoism Faces (12 pics)

Source


Do you like it?



№1 Author: capt.huffnpuff (7 Feb 2011 00:41) Total user comments: 2801


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Ever wonder why movie stars like to be photographed from their good sides? 51
  Reply       
№2 Author: MissGinette (7 Feb 2011 01:01) Total user comments: 612


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
04
  Reply       
№3 Author: Jimmy Johnson (7 Feb 2011 01:05) Total user comments: 5518


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +7
  • Like
How about showing the normal face for comparison.
  Reply       
№4 Author: nimbuszhang (7 Feb 2011 01:16) Total user comments: 188


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
ow, somebody's skull is not symmetrical
  Reply       
№5 Author: compmaster (7 Feb 2011 01:55) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№6 Author: DocMcCoy (7 Feb 2011 05:05) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
What? 17
  Reply       
№7 Author: You-Know-Who (7 Feb 2011 08:58) Total user comments: 499


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Cool!


04
  Reply       
№8 Author: yavzas (7 Feb 2011 13:36) Total user comments: 167


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
llloooolll
  Reply       
№9 Author: sawo (7 Feb 2011 13:36) Total user comments: 95


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
capt.huffnpuff, umm, no?
  Reply       
№10 Author: thesoulshaker (7 Feb 2011 13:47) Total user comments: 1384


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04 04
  Reply       
№11 Author: 2fuzzy (7 Feb 2011 14:41) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Some of them just look odd.
  Reply       
№12 Author: Naphia (7 Feb 2011 16:11) Total user comments: 1071


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
kinda scary 15
  Reply       
№13 Author: Ty Webb (7 Feb 2011 16:57) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
that was a bit odd
  Reply       
№14 Author: joffenbaker (7 Feb 2011 17:17) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -4
  • Like
Whad' I miss. This is retarted
  Reply       
№15 Author: i macedonian (7 Feb 2011 17:25) Total user comments: 249


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
stupid and lame.. why did i opened it 02
  Reply       
№16 Author: Lu (7 Feb 2011 19:22) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Interesting, but weird.
  Reply       
№17 Author: GhostChronos (7 Feb 2011 19:50) Total user comments: 2100


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
haha really weird 05
  Reply       
№18 Author: funkotronic (7 Feb 2011 21:06) Total user comments: 362


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
EWEWEW
  Reply       
№19 Author: adzhoe (8 Feb 2011 05:16) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
using up space and time,,,,thumbs down.
  Reply       
№20 Author: cusestuckinwa (17 Feb 2011 16:56) Total user comments: 129


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
i'm so confused
15
  Reply       
№21 Author: raymond.wendt (4 Mar 2011 02:19) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
wow, that's crazy. eat bacon for better symmetry!
  Reply       
№22 Author: wr0ngsalah (4 Apr 2011 07:20) Total user comments: 77


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
12 some people are not symmetry
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: