USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (230)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 2 Feb, 2011  |
  • Views: 4106  |
  • Like
  • +32
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

1 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


2 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


3 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


4 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


5 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)




6 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


7 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


8 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


9 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


10 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


11 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


12 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


13 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


14 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


15 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


16 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


17 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


18 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


19 Afghanistan from Above (19 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: GhostChronos (2 Feb 2011 02:36) Total user comments: 2100


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
nice photos 04
  Reply       
№2 Author: DocMcCoy (2 Feb 2011 03:13) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
very interesting. Thanks for posting. 12
  Reply       
№3 Author: adzhoe (2 Feb 2011 03:23) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Much more to Afghanistan than this.....
  Reply       
№4 Author: capt.huffnpuff (2 Feb 2011 04:30) Total user comments: 2801


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Why are the two personnel carriers so close together - blow up one, you blow up both! 79 (unless one is towing the other)
  Reply       
№5 Author: pedro carlos (2 Feb 2011 06:59) Total user comments: 856


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
capt.huffnpuff,
why would it blow up?
  Reply       
№6 Author: jeanpasqualin (2 Feb 2011 11:56) Total user comments: 637


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04 good dump
  Reply       
№7 Author: elunicotomas (2 Feb 2011 13:46) Total user comments: 1680


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№8 Author: choochwhocharlie (2 Feb 2011 17:37) Total user comments: 1963


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
bring our troops home and spend the money saving our cities
33 54 63 67
  Reply       
№9 Author: Pilgrim (2 Feb 2011 17:56) Total user comments: 2288


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Like the pics
  Reply       
№10 Author: 2fuzzy (2 Feb 2011 17:56) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Pedro: It is a safety thing, if a Road side bomb was to go off it would be a 2 for 1 deal. They should have some space between them for this very reason.

Good pics.
  Reply       
№11 Author: joffenbaker (2 Feb 2011 19:53) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I liked the aerial b & w's nice shots. That landscape looks so unforgiving.
  Reply       
№12 Author: Trifecta69 (2 Feb 2011 20:40) Total user comments: 1086


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
04 04 04
  Reply       
№13 Author: Lu (2 Feb 2011 21:12) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Ruskies couldn't tame it . . . . .
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: