USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (131)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Wikileaks Story Explained in One Comics (4 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 17 Dec, 2010  |
  • Views: 11412  |
  • Like
  • +50
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

1 Wikileaks Story Explained in One Comics (4 pics)


2 Wikileaks Story Explained in One Comics (4 pics)


3 Wikileaks Story Explained in One Comics (4 pics)


4 Wikileaks Story Explained in One Comics (4 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: amerJD (17 Dec 2010 01:19) Total user comments: 1400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
04 07 07
  Reply       
№2 Author: Dominique (17 Dec 2010 02:21) Total user comments: 1


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -11
  • Like
I dont see what's funny here ?!
  Reply       
№3 Author: mos ene (17 Dec 2010 02:45) Total user comments: 150


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +12
  • Like
Because you are too idiot to understand that, Dominique.
  Reply       
№4 Author: joffenbaker (17 Dec 2010 02:58) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
There may be more truth here than it seems, but I doubt it's coming from the U.S.
Somebody in Scandinavia obviously has a hard-on for Assange, Though,we will never really know, since all countries have been put out on the corner of Front and Center streets.
  Reply       
№5 Author: choochwhocharlie (17 Dec 2010 03:36) Total user comments: 1963


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Big Brother will have his way with poor Assange 46 but there will be someone else to take his place. I think I'll take up hacking as a hobby
  Reply       
№6 Author: adzhoe (17 Dec 2010 04:39) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -4
  • Like
crap
  Reply       
№7 Author: Royal (17 Dec 2010 06:46) Total user comments: 549


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
See? That's how it works, man.

You speak out too loudly... and get labeled a rapist. If I've seen it once, I've seen it a thousand times.

Happened to Dan Rather a couple times. Honest.
  Reply       
№8 Author: rockers114 (17 Dec 2010 07:35) Total user comments: 544


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
48

48
  Reply       
№9 Author: Trifecta69 (17 Dec 2010 12:52) Total user comments: 1086


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
06
  Reply       
№10 Author: fjolli (17 Dec 2010 13:26) Total user comments: 86


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +6
  • Like
all suport to the leak 04
  Reply       
№11 Author: Jimmy Johnson (17 Dec 2010 16:52) Total user comments: 5518


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
No different than any fascist attempt at censorship.
  Reply       
№12 Author: 2fuzzy (17 Dec 2010 17:29) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
I hope this all turns out well, and more people like him step up.
  Reply       
№13 Author: Lu (17 Dec 2010 18:05) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Uh . . . .yes.
  Reply       
№14 Author: Louie (18 Dec 2010 01:09) Total user comments: 8189


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
-_-
  Reply       
№15 Author: Ty Webb (18 Dec 2010 03:50) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
<b>mos

why don't you learn how to form a sentence before you start calling some one else an idiot.

  Reply       
№16 Author: Kraneo Dunkel (18 Dec 2010 06:00) Total user comments: 145


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
07 04
  Reply       
№17 Author: camelwide (18 Dec 2010 07:40) Total user comments: 414


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04 05 08
  Reply       
№18 Author: perez (18 Dec 2010 19:17) Total user comments: 757


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
O_o uh?
  Reply       
№19 Author: mahedi (19 Dec 2010 16:14) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№20 Author: mortex (20 Dec 2010 04:25) Total user comments: 740


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
It seems like people want to equate what Assange did with some form of human right to information. There are certain things in government that should be kept secret for a reason, sometimes revealed knowledge can do great damage e.g. revealing to the public possible vulnerabilities to terrorist threat--how is anyone better off by giving terrorists more knowledge. This is not even in the same realm as people being able to share music P2P, or watching t. v. shows online. 13
  Reply       
№21 Author: raymond.wendt (30 Dec 2010 05:23) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
damn canadians are behind it all
  Reply       
№22 Author: cherrygarcia14 (12 Jan 2011 20:38) Total user comments: 2278


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
08
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: