USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (66)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Building Demolition in China (7 pics)

  • Category: Pics  |
  • 24 Sep, 2010  |
  • Views: 5515  |
  • Like
  • +33
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

1 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


2 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


3 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


4 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


5 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)




6 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


7 Building Demolition in China (7 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: rodrigozanatta (24 Sep 2010 02:14) Total user comments: 691


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Is this correct? The build flip to back. But, its not more correct fall like... like.. world trade center?
  Reply       
№2 Author: adzhoe (24 Sep 2010 02:37) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
looks like it was meant to fall back into the berms that are built behind it
  Reply       
№3 Author: Jimmy Johnson (24 Sep 2010 02:54) Total user comments: 5518


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
The definitive test of WTC conspiracy theory as an inside job is to demoilish a steel structure skyscraper using all known (official) data and seeing how it falls. There are plenty of buildings that will be demolished in the next 10 - 20 years due to age and obsolescence for any developer around the world to test it. Las Vegas is blowing up 50 story hotels every other month.

No one seeking truth should let bullshit slide, especially 9/11. Never forget WTC Building 7, a 50 story skyscraper fell from an implosion a day after WTC from (supposedly) a small fire. Which is already implausible, how WTC falling is supposed to cause a fire in another freestanding building. The Pentagon crash is also incredulous - the most surveilled building in the world cannot provide video evidence of a plane crashing into it, because there is none. It's not like anyone is asking for footage of a UFO.
  Reply       
№4 Author: astroboy3000 (24 Sep 2010 05:17) Total user comments: 2543


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
Jimmy Johnson and I actually agree for once.
  Reply       
№5 Author: Sped17 (24 Sep 2010 06:38) Total user comments: 51


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
And i agree with both of you.....
  Reply       
№6 Author: mahedi (24 Sep 2010 10:23) Total user comments: 10772


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -4
  • Like
And I agree with all three people up there! 08
  Reply       
№7 Author: Link was here (24 Sep 2010 11:33) Total user comments: 1329


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -3
  • Like
Sped17,
I agree with you 07
  Reply       
№8 Author: galz (24 Sep 2010 13:47) Total user comments: 2043


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
i'am not agree with u 27
  Reply       
№9 Author: raymond.wendt (24 Sep 2010 14:26) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
meh
  Reply       
№10 Author: 2fuzzy (24 Sep 2010 15:17) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
demolition - always fun.
  Reply       
№11 Author: fluorescentG (24 Sep 2010 15:45) Total user comments: 3958


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
i'd go to see that. streamers were a nice touch
  Reply       
№12 Author: joffenbaker (24 Sep 2010 17:40) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
@ Jimmy, supposedly the only object that perfectly matched up to the hole in the pentagon was to be a tomahawk missle. A hole, no wings or damage from wings or remains of a plane. Same as in Pennsylvania. Not one scrap or person found. No life insurance was claimed.
  Reply       
№13 Author: Jimmy Johnson (24 Sep 2010 23:27) Total user comments: 5518


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -2
  • Like
What is incredibly suspicious is the "plane" that crashed into a section of the Pentagon was conveniently undergoing renovations, so there were no casualties. And what about the airports receiving the supposed passengers from the two 747s that crashed into WTC? The receiving sections were closed down because there wasn't going to be anyone asking what happened to their loved ones because the people that died chose to be on those planes. They were lied to... They didn't know it was a suicide mission. The rosters on each of those planes was less than half full. What airline has ever flown trans-continental on planes half full?
  Reply       
№14 Author: perez (25 Sep 2010 20:57) Total user comments: 757


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
01
  Reply       
№15 Author: salsapopo (26 Sep 2010 11:15) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
07 07
  Reply       
№16 Author: Governator (26 Sep 2010 12:16) Total user comments: 653


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
wow building down
on a later note...this was comment 1444444 ... and though it has no relevance what so ever with a building coming down... neither does this building have any relevance with what happened 9/11 13 13 13 13

eeh ..dont mind me, I'm just A LITTLE TIRED of demotheorists ranting everytime a building is knocked down...
the evidence is gone..gone.. for EVER...and a theory is what it will always be.
  Reply       
№17 Author: 2fuzzy (27 Sep 2010 16:04) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
I wish I had more than one up vote to give ya Governator.
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: