USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (230)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

Girls of CES (21 pics)

  • Category: Girls  |
  • 13 Jan, 2011  |
  • Views: 14812  |
  • Like
  • +26
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Girls from Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

1 Girls of CES (21 pics)


2 Girls of CES (21 pics)


3 Girls of CES (21 pics)


4 Girls of CES (21 pics)


5 Girls of CES (21 pics)




6 Girls of CES (21 pics)


7 Girls of CES (21 pics)


8 Girls of CES (21 pics)


9 Girls of CES (21 pics)


10 Girls of CES (21 pics)


11 Girls of CES (21 pics)


12 Girls of CES (21 pics)


13 Girls of CES (21 pics)


14 Girls of CES (21 pics)


15 Girls of CES (21 pics)


16 Girls of CES (21 pics)


17 Girls of CES (21 pics)


18 Girls of CES (21 pics)


19 Girls of CES (21 pics)


20 Girls of CES (21 pics)


21 Girls of CES (21 pics)

Source


Do you like it?



№1 Author: Decro435 (13 Jan 2011 01:59) Total user comments: 101


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
They used enough make-up..
  Reply       
№2 Author: fairmania (13 Jan 2011 02:39) Total user comments: 1436


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +12
  • Like
There are a few there I wouldn't go near, and there are only a few actual lookers in the whole group.

Were they really that desperate, that they had to take the old, the odd, the tired and the failed porn stars to populate the shows booths. Either that, or the cameraman had a faulty lens, because some of those girls faces are not the right shape.....

A truly disturbing group of women, and no mistake.
  Reply       
№3 Author: adzhoe (13 Jan 2011 03:52) Total user comments: 14959


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +3
  • Like
Well said Fairmania....Looks like they had a very small budget for girls, and it shows.Only 21 pictures too, dissapointing.
  Reply       
№4 Author: synyster616 (13 Jan 2011 05:19) Total user comments: 373


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I see one pornstar :D
  Reply       
№5 Author: Jockey straddler (13 Jan 2011 05:34) Total user comments: 700


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -4
  • Like
Gulp... 68
  Reply       
№6 Author: jeanpasqualin (13 Jan 2011 05:45) Total user comments: 637


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -4
  • Like
18 29 56
  Reply       
№7 Author: Jimmy Johnson (13 Jan 2011 07:51) Total user comments: 5518


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
CES must not pay a hell of a lot.
  Reply       
№8 Author: nico (13 Jan 2011 11:31) Total user comments: 3050


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
48
  Reply       
№9 Author: 2fuzzy (13 Jan 2011 14:48) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
I think some companies need to rethink their screening process for a 'booth babe'
  Reply       
№10 Author: joffenbaker (13 Jan 2011 14:52) Total user comments: 4965


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
The only cute one was the Japanese girl, rest of the looked like people who just left a "line-up" somewhere. I've never seen such rutty complexions since I saw "Machete"
  Reply       
№11 Author: compmaster (13 Jan 2011 16:07) Total user comments: 1871


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
59
  Reply       
№12 Author: Pilgrim (13 Jan 2011 16:17) Total user comments: 2288


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +2
  • Like
Ugly chicks!
  Reply       
№13 Author: moeshere (13 Jan 2011 17:48) Total user comments: 128


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
how do we say it SEX SALES 12
  Reply       
№14 Author: Lu (13 Jan 2011 18:58) Total user comments: 15082


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Yep, Ill take the Jappy and run.
  Reply       
№15 Author: shipking2003 (13 Jan 2011 19:32) Total user comments: 52


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Scanks
  Reply       
№16 Author: amerJD (13 Jan 2011 20:49) Total user comments: 1400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04 04 15 56 56
  Reply       
№17 Author: noxusrules (15 Jan 2011 16:35) Total user comments: 1052


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
Some of them are FUGLY but still 68
  Reply       
№18 Author: salsapopo (16 Jan 2011 10:30) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
sweet
  Reply       
№19 Author: Ty Webb (26 Jan 2011 01:17) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
fat chix with zitts.
there was not one girl above a 5 on a 1 to 10 scale.

yuck yuck yuck
  Reply       
№20 Author: raymond.wendt (28 Jan 2011 19:15) Total user comments: 9115


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
fairmania,

I agree, B list at best.
  Reply       
№21 Author: DocMcCoy (27 Sep 2011 02:32) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I'd do 'em. 05
  Reply       
№22 Author: YeahRight (26 Nov 2011 07:38) Total user comments: 1632


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
04
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: