USER PANEL



Login:
Password:

SEARCH 

ARCHIVE

«    Dec 2016    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

December 2016 (230)
November 2016 (725)
October 2016 (695)
September 2016 (727)
August 2016 (762)
July 2016 (695)

'09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)

  • Category: Cars  |
  • 30 Sep, 2009  |
  • Views: 10352  |
  • Like
  • +32
  • Dislike  |
  •  
  •   

Very interesting crash test.
Modern car wins.


1 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


2 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


3 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


4 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


5 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)




6 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


7 '09 Chevy Malibu vs. '59 Chevrolet Bel Air (7 pics)


Do you like it?



№1 Author: ash666 (30 Sep 2009 07:02) Total user comments: 1856


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
oh shit
  Reply       
№2 Author: unknownj (30 Sep 2009 09:43) Total user comments: 427


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
ofcourse the modern car wins! 17
  Reply       
№3 Author: salsapopo (30 Sep 2009 09:59) Total user comments: 12723


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
daaaam
  Reply       
№4 Author: louie (30 Sep 2009 13:31) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
unknownj,
Actually it shouldnt be like that!
  Reply       
№5 Author: tapatio (30 Sep 2009 13:40) Total user comments: 2047


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
OF COURSE IT SHOULD BE LIKE THAT YOU DUMB ASS, 40-50 YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY IMPROVES ALL FACES OF MAN KIND, SAFETY IS ONE OF THEM...!
  Reply       
№6 Author: atoum (30 Sep 2009 14:08) Total user comments: 51


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
older looks nicer tho
  Reply       
№7 Author: kikoya (30 Sep 2009 14:11) Total user comments: 0


  • Status:
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • -1
  • Like
actually it shouldn't be like that, since i've seen the video of it and the 59 has no engine nor transmission, and when the two cars meet a huge cloud of dust (you can see it on pic 3) rises from the 59. i had one of those old chevies and i can tell i would destroy ANY modern car.

sorry, rust not dust
  Reply       
№8 Author: mudassargold (30 Sep 2009 15:24) Total user comments: 1951


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
very bad cars for human
  Reply       
№9 Author: Grunt Callahan (30 Sep 2009 17:16) Total user comments: 2287


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
Automobile company's spend millions of dollars a year trying to make cars safer. Back in 1959 they really didn't give 2 shits. I would like to think the newer car would fare better.
  Reply       
№10 Author: NooFoo (30 Sep 2009 19:16) Total user comments: 799


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
you can tell there's no engine block in that old chevy, it would have crumpled the new car like it was tinfoil. the engine in that old chevy prolly weighs as much as 1/3 of the new car itself.
  Reply       
№11 Author: Ty Webb (30 Sep 2009 23:09) Total user comments: 6156


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • +1
  • Like
cars today are menat to cromple in the front and back....thats why they call them crumple zones in new cars. The Idea is that the car takes the impact not thr passenger inside so it looks like a lot of damage..and there is but it is desogned that way to absorb the energy of the impact before the energy reaches the passenger compartment...with no engine and trans the 59 looks like it absorbed the crash as welll. put the engine and trans back in and you will see a much different outcome. the engines and tranny set up are designed(in newer cars) to drop down and under so that they do not get pushed into the occupants of the car...this is all standard on new cars since the late 80's.
  Reply       
№12 Author: tapatio (9 Oct 2009 07:37) Total user comments: 2047


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
IMO cars are safer now in any event...
  Reply       
№13 Author: alpapito (21 Oct 2009 04:13) Total user comments: 97


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
But the Malibu still looks good! 04
  Reply       
№14 Author: olexo (22 Nov 2009 18:03) Total user comments: 839


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
07
  Reply       
№15 Author: khannibal (14 Jan 2010 14:57) Total user comments: 4711


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
09
  Reply       
№16 Author: Governator (20 Sep 2010 12:58) Total user comments: 653


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I still like the old chevy more... 04 12
  Reply       
№17 Author: 2fuzzy (18 Oct 2010 16:25) Total user comments: 10400


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
seems a waste of a classic.
  Reply       
№18 Author: DocMcCoy (30 Nov 2010 02:39) Total user comments: 6039


  • Status: User offline
  • Activity rewards:
  • Dislike
  • 0
  • Like
I'd bet on the new cars.
  Reply       

Add comment

Name:

E-Mail:


bold italic underlined strike Ensert smilies
Type the two words shown in the image: